VACCINES AND AUTISM

VACCINES AND AUTISM

For many years there has been a lot of discussion of the possible causative effects of the childhood vaccines. Much of the focus of past years has been on the issue of thimerosal, a preservative agent used in the vaccines. I think one of the main confusions at this point is the apparent inability of those viewing the argument, from either side, to separate the issues of thimerosal and the 'vaccines' themselves.
For example; recently reviewing the web site, http://fourteenstudies.org/ in the 'quick history' link, it presents 8 quotes, 6 of which specifically address only thimerosal as not being causative; and mockingly concludes with "That's an exhaustive and compelling "who's who" of our medical establishment and they are all saying the same thing in no uncertain terms: vaccines do not cause autism. Why in the world would any doctor, parent, or scientist try to argue otherwise?
My review of the evidence has convinced me that thimerosal is not the issue. And that is strongly supported by the fact that thimerosal in the vaccines was reduced to only trace amounts following a directive in 2001; yet the incidence of autism continued to increase. But, that said, I think it is not conclusive that vaccines are not causative.
So the 'nonscientific' on the manufacturer's side use the elimination of thimerosal to argue 'vaccines' are not the cause; and the nonscientific on the affected side continue to rant about thimerosal. Clear, unbiased thinking does not prevail – at least not in what is 'published'. As one of scientific background, I suggest that it is an argument to be won by presenting the necessary scientifically determined data.
My arguments are based my own literature search to review results of clinical studies to see what the data suggested. In particular, I focused on the issue of thimerosal (a compound containing mercury), which had been used as a preservative in vaccines; and which has been highlighted as a believed cause of autism. In the course of that review, I also came across many studies looking at vaccines in general, and also possible genetic factors. I further pursued the genetic factors issue in discussions with a couple of Ph.D. geneticists.

Regarding thimerosal, with rare exception, the clinical data does not show a correlation between thimerosal and the incidence of autism. My findings were supported further by thorough reviews done by government health agencies in this country as well as two European countries in their efforts to determine the need for further restriction on the use of thimerosal.

I understand the point that the major pharmaceutical companies could find ways to suppress data, or studies, that could be damaging to them from the standpoint of legal liability. While I accept that could happen in some cases, I find it unlikely that it could change the overall body of evidence, including the reviews by the FDA. But perhaps that argument need not be pursued in light of history - and the removal of anything more than trace amounts of thimerosal in vaccines in recent years.

Back in the 90's (don't recall the date, but believe in about 1992) the FDA reviewed the issue, and set limits on the use of thimerosal at levels believed to be "safe". In subsequent years there was considerable controversy over what was safe, and there was considerable pressure brought to eliminate thimerosal in childhood vaccines because of the belief that it could cause autism. In 1999 and 2000 the Public Health Services (including the FDA, NIH, CDC, HRSA) issued two Joint Statements, urging vaccine manufacturers to reduce, or eliminate, thimerosal in vaccines as soon as possible. As a result, and with pressure from the FDA, the levels used in childhood vaccines was significantly reduced, and in recent years has been only at 'trace' levels.

The important point here is that there is now significant history of essentially zero thimerosal exposure, yet the incidence of childhood autism has increased - not decreased. I think that is strong support for the conclusion that thimerosal was not a significant causative factor in autism. (http://www.fda.gov/CBER/vaccine/thimerosal.htm#act is a good summary)

Are there other possible factors associated with vaccines? Yes there are; one being the combination of live viruses that are the key ingredient of MMR vaccine. But as of now, clinical studies have not shown a correlation between the vaccines and autism. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist; just that there is no proof. There are only 'testimonials' and testimonials do not constitute scientific data. One only need review testimonials about a myriad of false "miracle cures" to be aware of that.

Perhaps with removal of thimerosal from the discussion, the focus on vaccines can provide evidence one way or the other.

Another point is that the focus on vaccines should detract from studies of other potential causative factors

What about genetic factors? As can be found in the literature, and clarified for me directly; there can be shown to be a genetic influence on the occurrence of practically every human malady. Whereas generally not causative, there are very definite genetic influences on susceptibility. Effectiveness of treatment is also affected by genetics; and the age is coming where the treatment of diseases will be tailored to the individual by reference to genetic mapping.

The data clearly shows that siblings are at a much higher risk than those not genetically related. In the case of twins, the risk is roughly 30 times that of the average child. It remains to be shown the degree to which this is attributed to genetic correlations, verus environmental correlations, since siblings are likely to share common environment as well as more common immunological schedules.

There are also studies that show much higher incidence of autism in certain geographical locations that have certain environmental contamination.

The point of all this is that, at this point in time, it is clear that THE cause of autism is not known. It is most quite likely a combination of factors. Research findings indicate there are genetic, environmental (including immunological), and metabolic components that influence the development of the disorder.

I believe it is not prudent to emphasize one causative factor over another, and certainly not to promote an anti-vaccine position which could promote negative consequences beyond what we can realize.

Thanks but no thanks on the medical cocktail...

My daughter afflicted with PDD-NOS an ASD whose umbilical cord stem cells frozen in Boston, MA, at time of birth prior to inoculations perhaps will someday hold the key to if vaccines are truly safe. The party line is there is no medical evidence that vaccinations do not cause autism. In fact, we are told medically they do not is a roll of the dice and the numbers for ASD is 1 out of 150 begs the question are we sure about that? But a billion dollar industry has nothing to gain only ensuring parents all is good when their child in being injected with multiple formulations of drugs claiming no statically serious side affects such as an ASD should be associated with any shots whatsoever is puzzling. Anyone watching nightly television commercial boosting miracle cures for whatever allies you the part about those potential side effects quickly run off at the end of the spot do we simply ignore those disclaimers? What about the government conceded that one of the 5000 legal cases that in fact her shots attributed to her autism was a direct correlation? Those who choose to ignore the number of neurotoxins injected into a new born in no way affects the child’s in any negative manner is frankly reckless from this parental point-of-view.

Dear 755 Victor -I cannot

Dear 755 Victor -

I cannot let this stand without at least a brief comment to be followed by a more in-depth rebuttal in the next few days.

You have focused on one issue – thimerosal – with a few other noise signals thrown in for effect. You argue because thimerosal has been reduced to “trace” amounts thimerosal in vaccines is safe.

You are wrong. Please define for me what a trace amount is and at what level it is safe to inject into a pregnant woman or a 6-month old baby. I would be very interested if you could reference your studies for me because thimerosal has been shown to be harmful at the nanomolar level and no studies have ever been conducted on the safety of “trace” amounts in infants.

“Trace amounts” is one of those feel-good words the CDC throws around with such assurance one is led to believe it actually means something that has been thoroughly tested.

For years the FDA touted ethyl as the good mercury as opposed to methyl, the bad mercury. Ethyl is the mercury in thimerosal - methyl is what you find in fish. Therefore thimerosal was safe while eating tuna could be dangerous.

When independent studies were done it turned out the FDA was wrong. The body could not easily detoxify ethylmercury and it did cross the blood-brain barrier.

I will post a more detailed rebuttal soon.

vaccines

Very interesting about the trace amounts , Ed. It is certainly frustrating trying to find scientific answers while not being in a scientific field. What I also question concerning the removal of thimerosal from infant vaccines and the subsequent continuance of cases is that around the same time that thimerosal was removed here in the U.S., it began to be recommended that pregnant women and children 6 months and older receive yearly flu vaccinations--which still contain thimerosal. Are there studies that have taken this discrepancy into account, Victor?

There are so many unanswered

There are so many unanswered questions about thimerosal, Kathryn and you raise one that is uppermost in the minds of parents and vaccine safety advocates everywhere. Infants and pregnant women receive the full 25 mg of thimerosal in flu shots that are now part of the vaccine schedule.

Where are the safety studies, you ask? The reason you can’t find them is not because you do not come from a scientific field – the reason is they don’t exist. The use of thimerosal was grandfathered in by the FDA in vaccines, meaning no safety studies were ever done or needed to be done.

Another overlooked aspect of the thimerosal debate is that thimerosal is used as an antifungal agent in the manufacture of vaccines and is chelated out in the final preparation. Yet, there are no independent tests required to ensue the thimerosal was indeed removed.

Another common sense question never addressed is, if some of the vaccines were reformulated without 25 mg of thimerosal what is the new formulation and where are the safety studies? Again, they were never done.

As parents we are expected to believe that pharmaceutical companies conjuring up new formulations put safety before profits. Sorry. I don’t believe pharma has your child’s best interests at heart.